12.24.2009
Coup de Grâce
It would have been too easy to kill me on the flight to Kansas City, but that didn't stop him from at least letting the plane unexpectedly drop for three seconds, some of the longest three seconds of my life, time enough for me to have full view from my aisle seat of one of the flight attendants drop down into a crouch reminiscent of a "duck and cover" video. My copy of The Economist slide off of my tray table and on to the floor, but I was too busy clutching the edge of my seat, bracing myself in a maneuver that could be the basis for an existentialist joke: you can cling all you want to your seat and your life, but it's not going to stop that metal coffin from dropping. Even after the plane balanced out, I kept my hands in the same place, not picking up my magazine, not moving a single tensed muscle for 20 minutes, only listening to the too-loud, tinny laughter of the passengers who cope through sublimating their fears. When I removed them - once we were safely braced against the ground - the leather was shiny black from sweat.
No, it's always the slow route with me, the Catherine wheel and not the guillotine. Which is why I here, going through the motions of a religion that has mostly done me irreperable harm, clamping my mouth shut when my grandmother repeatedly asks about the effeminate guy on Glee if "we're sure he's a boy" or when she calls Obama a "dumb man from Illinois who has half the country looking for work," and diverting my eyes around a callendar that praises women for being the great self-sacrificers behind all good men. Tonight I get to answer the same prying questions about my love life, which finally exists again but which I get to mask with my usual dry spell responses: "i'm just so busy with school," "I've got a lot of great friends but no one special," and, new for 2009, "well, I didn't want to get into something before I left for Europe." And everyone will look at me disdainfully when I feign almost bashful repentence for my lack of interest in KU sports. I'll hold my breath all Christmas, but no one will rush me a stay of execution, and no one, not even I, will be brave enough, or know enough, to bestow a coup de grâce.
12.12.2009
Tiger
We're doing two things wrong here: assuming we understand the inner workings of someone's personal life, and expecting celebrities, who are in a unique difficulties - they're under unusual pressure and offered unusual opportunities - to be role models. Even if this is legit infidelity, being able to hit a ball in a hole never qualified Tiger Woods to be an amazing person; we should never have expected him to be, even without the unusual complications of super-celebrity.
(sorry this is old news, but after being bombarded with tiger "news" since I got here...)
Addendum: Okay, just kidding. Further information leads to the conclusion that he's a sleazy dirtbag.
Fourth Thanksgiving
- A bed that does not screech when I get in it, comforters, comfort in general
- Umbilical cord -free internet.
- A sex-sized shower, primary (only) used for its secondary function of leg-shaving accommodation. Also one that doesn't run out of hot water in 4-6 minutes.
- Netflix! Hulu! NBC.COM! Basically, videos being licensed for the country I'm in.
- Margaritas. My parents willingness to make me cocktails.
- Time to read books, write in them, actually enjoy them (maybe after I've recovered from compact western civ trauma, I might go back and read some philosophy)
Things I could really see more of:
- Well-dressed men, additionally with a facial piercing, particularly nose studs.
- Really, well-dressed everyone, including me.
- Paris-style temperatures.
- Publictransportation/art&architecture/fastyetqualityfood etc.
Things I could probably see less of:
- Sports, constantly on our TV.
- Cute viral videos catered to the daytime talkshow watching demographic.
- Mail, on every surface in my parents house, that proves the law of superposition via checking magazine dates.
- Movies censored for language.
(Side rant: I would argue that turning the Penis Game in "500 Days of Summer" into the "Pandas" Game is significantly more offensive - also, I'm sorry, but does artistic license and maintaining the integrity of characters not matter at all? If you're going to be offended by 20/30-somethings talking about blowjobs & "other jobs" shouldn't you be watching a Reese Witherspoon movie? That's not Cruel Intentions?)
In summary: good to be home, wish home was europe.
12.08.2009
12.04.2009
15
11.28.2009
Practical/Prático/Pratique/Pratico Language
When I was in third grade I got into an argument with my teacher about why we should learn French instead of Spanish. My position was simple and straightforward: I liked France. France, particularly its language, had been a large part of my upbringing: my mother, despite not being a native speaker, taught me the alphabet and numbers in both languages and lulled me to sleep with “Frere Jacques” as often as “Rock-a-bye Baby.” On the weekends she would brush up her French watching PBS’s “French in Action,” and I dreamt about one day going to the places shown in the show’s opening, especially the water garden outside of the Pompidou with “the lips.” To my nine-year-old self, learning Spanish merely meant being able to order at a Mexican restaurant in a different language, which I was too shy to do anyway. No one I was friends with spoke Spanish, and at the time product labels and billboards didn’t show up in both language; Spanish just didn’t play into my everyday life.
My teacher’s argument was pretty simple, too. She rolled down the world map, pointed to the two countries, Mexico and France, and then pointed to us. “Which country is closer?” she said testily. I scowled at Texas for betraying me, its borders cozied right up to millions of people who hablaron español. France was just too far away to be useful, end of discussion.
+++
Language is perhaps the one cultural marker that has to answer to practicality. Traditions like Fourth of July fireworks expend significant resources in a literal flash, food culture has just recently truly begun to have to answer to its environmental and health effects, and few people look at Michelangelo’s David and say, “Sure, that’s pretty, but think of all the kitchen countertops they could have made.” Language, however, is both inherently cultural and inherently practical. It expresses unique nuances about a culture and what it holds important, such as German’s schaudenfreude or the Inuit’s multiple words for snow. Language conducts culture as well, the means through which oral and written traditions of a people are passed on from generation to generation. It holds a people together and sets them apart – which, of course, is problematic when you want to unify people cross-culturally into a supranational organization. Europe’s 32 official languages express a unique cultural diversity, but presents difficult challenges when trying to communicate messages between nations. I have enough trouble each morning communicating to the cashier at the café which pastry I want, and that interaction only involves two languages and basic vocabulary – I can’t imagine trying to ratify a treaty in a council with ten or twenty languages represented. Clearly the proposed strategy of adopting one to three languages of “wider communication” is significantly more practical. But so are marble kitchen countertops.
+++
Years after I realized my dream of seeing the mechanical lips of the Pompidou water garden, I opted to study Italian to fulfill my foreign language requirement during college. While I was never the most talented or dedicated Italian student, I did take enough away from my two years of study to order a panino or ask the price of a pair of boots. While everyone around me on the transatlantic flight watched romantic comedies and slept, I stayed up cramming vocabulary and verb ending back into my brain. This was more important and more real than any exam.
Once we’d dropped our bags off at our new apartment, my fellow jetlagged expatriates and I wandered down to the corner café for some much needed coffee. How to order un caffé is the one of the first things KU's Italian program teaches you how to do, and thus I was more than ready, warming my tongue up for the rolled r’s of vorrei like a runner stretching her hamstrings before a 50-meter sprint. I wanted to start this trip off with a quick, easy boost to my Italian speaking confidence, but as each of my roommates ordered with not even an Italian “grazie,” I realized all my training was for naught. The barista took their requests in stride and stated how much money they owed in crisp, practiced English. I ordered my caffé in Italian nonetheless, but the luster of my unique knowledge had disappeared with each familiar English word.
The EU may not need to bother with selecting languages of “wider communication,” for the European people seem to have chosen them for themselves, although it’s clearly a coerced decision. English may be the language of 80% of data storage, but more importantly it is the language of popular media – just try to escape the dulcet tones of Lady Gaga, or flip through TV channels and see how few “foreign” films you catch. And within city centers and other popular travel destinations, English is the language of multitude of tourists. The English language is no longer merely a tool to cater to those from English-speaking countries – it is truly a language of wider communication between peoples from around the globe. One afternoon I caught two people with two different native tongues awkwardly discuss directions on a street corner, cobbling together an understanding from the English they both knew.
Despite my 3rd grade teacher’s strong argument for learning Spanish, my argument against it was just as practical: no one I knew spoke it, so why should I? The same attitude represents the future of the “languages of intimacy,” the unfortunate tongues not chosen for wider communication: eventually everyone will speak the larger languages, and once everyone you know speaks one language, why even bother with a second language of limited use?
Right now, Europeans still generally hold firm to their mother tongues, be even so, it’s undeniable that English is creeping in. When my mother first visited Paris 25 years ago it was virtually impossible to get around without some proficiency in French; by the time I started making trips to Europe with my parents 15 years later, I could easily get by with some hand gestures and a smile, if not plain English. Perhaps linguistic diversity is just another thing of beauty that will disappear from our cultural landscape, hunted into extinction like giant kangaroos and wooly mammoths. But even as we hold language to a higher standard of practicality, maybe we will respect it in a way society has found easy to do with less practical cultural markers: as valuable in and of itself, and worth the trouble no matter the cost.
11.14.2009
Bonne Nouvelle to Strasbourg - St. Denis
11.09.2009
Artificial Stressors
Monthly Info
11.08.2009
Two Suggestions Regarding Absinthe
11.06.2009
Tri-Color Rotini
This Morning
11.05.2009
Jour... du Jour
11.03.2009
Jour Deux
11.02.2009
Jour Un
11.01.2009
Feet
10.29.2009
Yes
10.21.2009
Sunglasses
10.12.2009
Octo-Italia
10.05.2009
WC&H: A Thinly Veiled Intro to Christianity
10.04.2009
Sardinia
9.30.2009
Quick Trip to the Grocery Store, Vegetable Risotto
9.28.2009
Valuable Extracurricular Vocabulary
9.26.2009
Sant'Ambrogio Market
9.14.2009
Things I Have Learned in Europe, by Cara
9.11.2009
I Polpi
9.08.2009
In Which I Almost Leave for Europe
Jus de Pamplemousse
9.06.2009
Desperately Seeking Straight Daughter
9.03.2009
Peer Pressure
9.02.2009
Aim Low
Arcadian’s Got Talent
Unfortunately for NBC, 13-year-old Arcadian Broad, however graceful and well-groomed, is not a magician’s assistant. He is a dancer.
And he is not a stooge.
My mom and I have always had theories about AGT: it’s clear that certain acts make it through for variety, certain people make it through solely on kitsch value, and certain performers are made to jump through unnecessary hoops by the producers so that other “chosen” acts will make it through to the next round or to amp up the show as the weeks go on at the performer’s expense. Simple acts have random break dancers thrown in the background or are surrounded by fancy sets and pyrotechnics to distract from whether or not they’re actually talented.
Arcadian Broad managed to make it through the competition without all of that. In his first three performances, he stuck to what makes him special: he is an incredibly talented solo dancer. He leaps and bounds across the stage with intense energy, style, flexibility, grace, and enthusiasm. His most impressive performance came during the Quarter Finals, when he (unnecessarily, as the judges pointed out) whipped out his piano-playing talent, and then knocked out an awesome performance to Footloose. The judges loved him, everyone freaking loved him, and he made it through to tonight’s the semi-finals.
Sources say gravity was asleep on the job while Arcadian was performing.
Everything about Arcadian was wrong tonight, though. In his pre-performance video he revealed that he’d be doing some paired dancing with a new girl dancer, even though he is clearly a one-boy show. And then he came on to a stage full of backup dancers in a basketball jersey and, like a little marionette, performed the dance moves to High School Musical’s “We’re All in This Together.” He hoisted his very young partner awkwardly above his head, moved in sync with his other puppet dancers, and, with the exception of a few pirouettes, exhibited none of the wild, bold dancing of his previous performances.
Heteronormitivity: we're all in this together.
So it was no surprise when the judges’ reactions were rather tepid, with the sort of coddling they reserve for only the very young, very old, or very military. However, Arcadian was not walking off the stage without exhibiting his flair somehow. In the middle of one of the judge’s criticisms, he turned to Nick Cannon and asked if he could say something, and then let loose a big one: he had something else planned for the semi-finals, but the show’s producers instead made him perform what would clearly be a family-friendly crowd-pleaser.
Oops.
Sharon Osborne immediately jumped in, saying that he didn’t need to give excuses and that he was clearly a talented boy and a great dancer, etc. etc., but the damage was done. Arcadian had had his say: he was no puppet.
But America’s Got Talent’s puppetry of Arcadian goes beyond trying to reel in viewers with a shoutout to a successful franchise: it shows the dirty way producers shape people into products, and the deeper messages at work.
And this is where I have to throw in the usual disclosure: yes, I know I’m highly trained by other mainstream-media-hating, ultra-skeptical, loudmouthed obnoxious feminist queerz, but I feel like I’m not reading super hard into this one (just like I believe with all my heart that the panty liner magician is gay as blazes).
In the quarterfinals, Arcadian was branded as America’s real-life Billy Elliott – a somewhat soft-spoken boy with a natural passion for dancing, overcoming adversity from his ignorant classmates. “At school the kids would always tease me about being a dancer,” said Arcadian in his quarter-finals video, “but when I’m dancing I feel like I’m in a whole different world. I feel invincible.”
Sure, you can’t trust the obviously staged shots and polished dialogue of the videos, meant to give viewers a true glimpse into the lives of these every-day celebrities, but the story seems pretty believable and Arcadian quite sincere. Nobody that talented at dancing and playing the piano can be that cool. Both take a large commitment of time practicing in private - but more importantly, they are both pretty “gay” hobbies for a thirteen-year-old boy. No one makes fun of male dancers without playing the gay card – Dane Cook, who’s social commentary isn’t exactly known for being groundbreaking, exhibits this perfectly in his bit about dance clubs: “You will never, ever hear a guy say to one of his buddies, 'Mike -- Mike, Mike, listen, buddy. Tonight, bro, I gotta dance, dude. Screw chicks tonight, bro -- I gotta dance!” A straight guy, that is. You just know the teasing has a hint of the gay when the bullies are 13-year-olds, who have just been passed the uber-masculinity torch and probably aren’t exactly known for their creative insults.
So as a counterpoint, this weeks video featured a different side of Arcadian – not the shy, dedicated boy who’s only passion is for dancing, but of the up and coming suave, popular kid, who’s lady is back home acting as his PR director. Okay, maybe that’s taking it a bit far. But so is the line something along the lines of “It’s nice to have her back there supporting me” - god I know that’s not the phrasing but something along the lines of “thank god my beard’s printing out flyers for me and acting like a good little housewife.” There were then a ton of shots of Arcadian with a nice young girl his own age, and thank god for that. Behind every successful man is a woman… who wishes she were a man - both for rights and so that her husband will look at her the way he looks at the milkman.
Whether Arcadian is gay or straight is not the point – Arcadian could already be getting a head start on a long career of fucking dancerladies for all I know or care. The point is just how far mainstream media will go to uphold the standard of heteronormativity. Producers see a vibrant male dancer, code for gay, and then make sure that he’s seen with ladies all over him from then on. Back during the aftermath of last season of American Idol I didn’t buy people’s arguments that Adam Lambert lost the competition because he was gay, but I definitely thought it was fishy that he seemingly had to go back in the closet in order to be a part of Idol. Just like Ethan from Queer as Folk, producers want their young talent hot and straight so they can make the big bucks off of fangirls, or at least not lose money because of politics.
Arcadian probably won’t win the competition, though, especially after tonight's little encore. But for the sake of the American family and their viewership, NBC has made it clear there will be no roll models for young gay boys, or young dancer boys, or young boys anywhere that don’t fit in. After all, they’re not in the business of making role models, they’re in the business of making stars.
9.01.2009
5 Years
It’s pretty painfully obvious that I’m freaking out about writing/careers/my future/my identity right now. I’m currently contemplating and planning my future as a super-senior and what I’m going to get out of the extra time I’m buying myself before I have to blindly commit to go down some uncertain path. As relationship freakouts were to xanga, career freakouts are to blogger.
Obviously, writing has been a huge part of my identity for the majority of my life (or at least the years worth counting – I’d say before eight, kids are as interchangeable as Runts – they all look different but underneath they’re all the same flavor), and I think it’s no coincidence that letting it slide has coincided with some major identity crises in the last couple of years. It terrifies me that I can’t just do it. Even if I’m being good and tunnel visioning every other successful writer/blogger I’m personally acquainted with out of the picture, I’m still not where I wanted to be as a writer going into my senior year. Senior year of high school I was on top of my blogging game. I would have hoped I could be on top of my essay-writing game as my college counterpart.
I read the word of people 10-20 years older than me (at least), who have substantially more writing/career/life experience (and paid editors), and I can’t wrap my head around why I’m not at their level right now. I lost my patience for the slow maturation of my writing the moment my first essay got published and my professor pushed me towards professional writers workshops and a lifestyle of dedication and contemplation I am still in no place to sustain. Since then, I feel like I’ve always been trying to catch up to those expectations, to get serious about writing rather than just doing it, whether it’s good, whether anyone reads it, whether it’s even worth keeping more than a few minutes. I just want to pound out publishable piece after publishable piece, at whatever expense – and it’s that pressure that keeps me from writing anything at all.
Right now, I’m really into David Rakoff. I keep thinking about how next year I’m just going to reread books I love and analyze them, and I’m so eager (god how nerdy) that I keep thinking about Xeroxing copies of essays from Don’t Get Too Comfortable and scribbling all over them. A couple of days ago I came across this interview with him, and was more reassuring than anything anyone’s said to me lately – not my friends, not my professors, not my mother.
“Before I sat down and became a writer, before I began to do it habitually and for my living, there was a decades-long stretch when I was terrified that it would suck, so I didn't write. I think that marks a lot of people, a real terror at being bad at something, and unfortunately you are always bad before you can get a little better.”
Okay, I knew the last part. No one makes it out of elementary school without having phrases like that scorched into your retinas via block letters on neon-colored laminated posters. But I really needed to hear straightforwardly what I can really easily be deduced from putting together the pieces of his, and every other writer’s, essays: all the good ones weren’t always writers. David Sedaris smoked way more pot than I ever have throughout college and he seems to have ended up a decent writer. I’ve got ten, fifteen, twenty years (although right now the voice of David Bowie is singing me “five years”) before I have to be a writer for the New Yorker or kill myself. What is there to worry about.
"Magic"
8.30.2009
How's that for being self aware
Other realizations:
- I took a year off of writing to focus on reading, which then spanned into two years, not because i was actually focusing on reading to better my writing but because I am lazy and scared that I'm not funny anymore and that my moment as a published writer is now behind me.
- What's the worst that could happen if i just told the truth? Context: this blog would be significantly better if my mom didn't barrage me with articles about how you have to list every internet alias you've ever used if you ever want to get a job with the government or how if you do anything slightly adventurous or out of the norm with your life you will never be allowed around children again. The latter of which I'm sure isn't true, or is at least completely unwarranted, since i know a tattooed, pot-smoking daycare teacher who is incredibly invested in her job and the welfare of her charges, and godspeed to her. Would Hunter S. Thompson be able to find employment in today's workplace? Does everyone realize that it would be a crime if he didn't exist as a force within journalism?
- I think i've lost all my empathy and understanding of others' points of view and become a radical.But it's not like they're your real family, Cara.True and false. On paper they are. But I am living proof that genetic relation does matter - ex: I clearly missed out on the Catholic gene, which, much to my continued shock, everyone else in my family possesses.So, you tell them the truth, thereby standing by your life choices and having integrity, and the number of interactions between your extended family and you falls from "incredibly rare" to "none." And there'd probably be a good story involved.You're right. This is really a win-win.
- The only thing i'm an expert on anymore is myself.
Simple Request
8.29.2009
21 and Overly-Emotional
Most of the girls on 16 and Pregnant have absolutely no concept of what it takes to raise a child, but assume that everything will magically fall into place as quickly and easily as it was to make their little bundle of runny feces. Not Catelynn and Tyler, though. It's obvious the facts that they look (and probably are) the youngest of the couples and that they have significantly less money and more familial problems play into their decision to give up their child, but it's no less shocking. As the youngest, they should lack the maturity to make such a decision, and as the least privileged, they should be the ones to repeat the cycle, but they're not - in fact, Catelynn and Tyler go out of their way to make it clear to their parents (which, p.s. her wastrel mother and his ex-con father got married after meeting through their children) that they're going to give their child what they never received from them.
Ironically, through the process of giving their daughter up for adoption, Catelynn and Tyler prove themselves to be the most responsible and ready to be parents of all of the couples. While Farrah is busy worrying about what type of car her parents are going to replace the vehicle she wrecked with, Catelynn is choosing what family will provide the best life for her daughter. And Tyler blows all of the other baby daddies out of the water by not only sticking with Catelynn throughout her pregnancy and afterwards, but fiercely defending their choices as a couple to their deadbeat parents, who fight Caitlynn and Tyler's decision tooth and nail. And you thought Gary returning his new Playstation 3 was good teen parenting.
Watching Catelynn and Tyler interact with their daughter's prospective adoptive family was completely heart-wrenching. I'd never seen that side of adoption before, the actual real process of handing your child over to another family. The adoptive mother's eagerness reminded me of Jennifer Garner's character in Juno - you could just tell how achingly desperate she was for a child. Even though she was clearly elated to have been chosen it was written all over her face how terrified she was that things weren't going to work out, and once you meet the adoptive couple, the tension of the episode builds as you worry that Catelynn might just keep the baby and crush these people's hearts. During every scene with the adoptive parents i could see my parents, twenty-one years younger, right in their places - explaining their lifestyle and hobbies, making their case for why they deserved to raise me, waiting in agonizing anticipation until i just showed up in their lives completely unannounced. It was absolutely excruciating. In the last few years i've experienced a great range of inner conflict about the idea of adoption and how it has shaped me, but rarely do i think about what it's like (and is still like) for the other two parties involved. At this point, i feel like it's old news to everyone but me - but if it's still an issue for me twenty-one years later, the one party who wasn't even really there for most of the actual process, why wouldn't everyone else still be thinking about it as well?
All in all, i'm rather floored at how much 16 and Pregnant really got to me, considering I was looking for more maury-esque escapades from it than anything else. Thank god for Maci and Farrah. Fuming over them totally helped bring me back to my usual schadenfreude-lovin' self.
(Also I can't stand how boring and dry I sound in this, but god, at least i wrote something. And I've written two abandoned half-essays. But mostly I'm blowing through backissues of The Believer. Why didn't i bring more than 7 issues with me? Oh that's right because i figured i wouldn't read them just like i haven't read through all of the other 30 that are sitting in my Lawrence storage unit. Wah wah wahhh. )